HR Advisory

Performance Improvement vs Performance Enhancement

Performance Improvement vs Performance Enhancement

When we talk about the people in an organization - we are actually thinking about the performance of those people. And it is the performance which makes or breaks organizations. What actually drives performance? Some believe that it is the competency and knowledge of individuals or collective competencies of an organization. However, I would like to point out that the performance of an organization is impacted by many factors, including policies and most importantly, its culture. 

Some leaders may believe in Theory X, which assumes that people dislike work and will avoid doing anything they don’t have to. And therefore, they must be controlled and coerced into getting the job done.  There are some others who follow Theory Y, which assumes that most people want to work, and that they will be self-directed, creative, and ingenious in pursuing individual or collective goals.

Many of us have heard about ‘Performance Improvement Programs’ (PIP). It is a common term in sales, especially in insurance sales. But not many may have heard about Performance Enhancement Programs. 

In this article, I shall draw your attention to why the PIP approach is a Theory X approach and should be avoided especially when the work is not of a repetitive nature or requires some managerial skills. Although I personally believe that Theory X never really works. 

The difference between Performance Improvement and Performance Enhancement is the perception, and therefore the approach. 

Performance Improvement perceives that something in performance is not so good and therefore needs to be improved – judgmental approach. So the approach involves rectification, which in turn has a time period. 

Performance Enhancement perceives the performance to be fine, but can be enhanced or made better by adding certain skills. Therefore, the approach involves adding value. Performance enhancement is a process and can be applicable to all. It has no expiry date and it is a continuously evolving mechanism. 

So while the objective of both may is to influence performance — one has a negative impact and the other a positive one. 

How are employees and the leadership team/HR impacted?

Performance Improvement Program- PIP

Performance Enhancement Program- PEP
  • A PIP letter is kind of a warning, which says, improve …targets and target dates both mentioned …...else……
  • Results: Employees feel threatened and instead of improving they start searching for alternate jobs.
  • Focus remains more on sales and less on business development.
  • A PEP letter may say- “Thanks for your association and contribution. We are pleased to invite you for a Sales Training ……”
  • Result: Employees do not feel threatened and make an attempt to learn and improve.
  • Focus is on business development and employees here become product/service experts.
  • HR professionals may focus more on the processing of letters, follow ups and actions related to exit if results not achieved.
  • HR professionals focus on development programs, follow up with business leaders as to how business targets can be achieved, and facilitate performance.
  • Attrition rate escalates and new talents are hesitant to join
  • Attrition is controlled, i.e. brand of the organization attracts talent.
  • Top management comprises managers who seek quick results
  • Top managers are true leaders who believe performance enhancement is a gradual process and once achieved, has long-lasting positive effects   

Tips for Performance Enhancement

  • Never let the employees feel threatened: Verbal abuses and use of warning letters should be the last resort for impacting performance. Remember, employees want security. They have families to support and will never be able to perform if their peace of mind is taken away.
  • Understand the reason behind unsatisfactory performance: Try and help the employees by supporting them in overcoming the obstacles preventing them from performing. This can be done through counseling and training programs. Handhold them if required and tell them how to do it. Accompany them on a few calls. 
  • Organize small competitions: Not everyone can take a big leap. So, if someone moves from 30% 50% achievement – recognize him. A contest called ‘well tried’ or something of those lines can be organized. 
  • Start coaching people: Set aside a day to just talk about the industry, the services and what can be done to achieve a higher space. Don’t review, just talk. And when I say talk- do not make it a monologue. Invite views, make it a meaningful interaction.

At the end I would just like to say, if we believe that employees should take ownership, then employers should lead by example, and also take ownership of employees. Achieve business goals collectively, together as one unified and strong team. To quote A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, “The best way to win is to not need to win. The best performances are accomplished when you are relaxed and free of doubt.”

Parul Darbari
Principal Consultant


Related Articles

HR Advisory

Actions to be Avoided as Leaders- As Managers you may often do them!

Read More

HR Advisory

Have faith- Advance Step by Step

Read More